<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Talk Like A Duck: RubyConf 2007 Friday Morning  - Marcel's Talk</title>
    <link>http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/articles/2007/11/02/rubyconf-2007-friday-morning-marcels-talk</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>In Ruby, it's not the dog, it's the tricks!</description>
    <item>
      <title>RubyConf 2007 Friday Morning  - Marcel's Talk</title>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/files/2007-11-02_ruby_conf_2007logo_200x_123.png" alt="Ruby Conf 2007logo 200x 123" height="123" width="200" style='border-width:1px; border-color:#444444; margin-bottom:30px; margin-right:30px;border-style:solid;float:left;'&gt;
The conference led off with Marcel Molina reprising his Ruby Hoedown talk &lt;a href="http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/articles/2007/08/20/aspects-of-beauty-proportion-integrity-clarity-and-monkey-patching"&gt;"What Makes Code Beautiful"&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;p&gt;I notice that he's changed the final solution to the problem he posed to "monkey-patch" String, instead of introducing a CoercibleString subclass.  Did he read my earlier blog post?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 06:22:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:96790897-ff28-495c-9836-eab2c3018a95</guid>
      <author>Rick DeNatale</author>
      <link>http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/articles/2007/11/02/rubyconf-2007-friday-morning-marcels-talk</link>
      <trackback:ping>http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/articles/trackback/478</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
